And no, I’m not mad. But I do want to tell you what they gave up.
Here’s what happened.
Two months after we placed a fantastic team member with a client, the client ended the contract. They went direct, cutting us out — even though it was against the agreement.
It’s a common assumption. They saw a great hire and figured they could just go direct and keep the magic going. From the outside, it looked like we added a markup and then disappeared.
But here’s what many business owners forget when they think like that.
We didn’t just plug in a person and walk away.
We listened when they told us what they needed.
We politely disagreed and recalibrated the role so it made more sense.
We filtered over a thousand candidates across three time zones.
We onboarded, aligned, and coached through the first thirty days.
We ran reviews, check-ins, and gave her a roadmap to thrive.
We stayed in the background to solve problems before they turned into churn.
What they saw was a great hire.
What they missed was the system behind her success.
Great hires aren’t just people. They’re the product of systems, coaching, and care.
If you’re not hiring every week, you don’t have hiring systems. You don’t have a ready pipeline or a backup plan. You don’t have time to coach, review, and replace.
And that’s the invisible value a good agency brings. It acts like a fractional HR department, always there to step in.
So yes, they saved money on paper. But with the next hire, they’ll be starting from scratch — without the systems that made this one thrive.
-
Every decision in your company shouldn’t merge into a single lane
Every decision in your company shouldn’t merge into a single lane.
A founder once told me his company had a “people problem.”
Projects were slow.
Decisions stalled.
Small issues kept escalating to him.
His conclusion was simple:
“The team isn’t proactive enough.”
So we mapped how decisions actually moved inside the company.
It looked like a highway system.
Except every road — sales, operations, client delivery, finance — eventually merged into a single checkpoint.
His desk.
Every approval.
Every exception.
Every “quick confirmation.”
The team wasn’t the bottleneck.
The design was.
When every decision has to pass through one person, the company doesn’t slow down because people are incapable.
It slows down because the structure forces them to wait.
Founders often think scale means hiring more drivers.
But if the road still leads to the same toll booth, traffic only gets worse.
Real scale happens when decisions move closer to the work.
When authority is clear.
When ownership is visible.
When escalation is the exception, not the system.
The question isn’t whether your team is capable of moving faster.
The real question is:
How many decisions in your company still have only one lane?
-
Surf Pursuit
The Big Oxmox advised her not to do so, because there were thousands of bad Commas, wild Question.
-
Culture Matters in Hiring But Clarity Comes First
Hiring feels hard. We chase culture fit. We obsess over “value alignment.” And yes, they matter. But if I’m honest, I’d bet that 95% of failed hires come down to one boring thing: bad, or nonexistent, job descriptions especially in small companies.
I’ve seen it in my own businesses, and I’ve seen it when friends ask me why their new hire isn’t working out. If the role itself isn’t clear, no amount of culture magic will fix it.
Over the years, here’s what I’ve learned makes a job description actually work:
1️⃣ Purpose – why the role exists at all
2️⃣ Reporting – who they answer to
3️⃣ Company intro – why someone should be excited to join
4️⃣ Objectives – the real outcomes you expect
5️⃣ Day-to-day duties – what they’ll actually be doingIt sounds simple, but most job descriptions I see are either vague (“we just need a VA”) or contradictory (“do our marketing and fix IT”). No wonder the hires don’t stick.
So before you go looking for “the perfect cultural fit,” ask yourself: would a smart, motivated person even know how to succeed in this role? That clarity is where good hiring really starts.
