Everyone knows an Emma.
Emma, the founder drowning in to-dos.
Emma, who swore this month she’d finally get help.
Emma, who spent three hours on Fiverr trying to find “a VA who can do everything.” I call them unicorns.
I’ve met many Emmas, and here’s what I’ve observed: Emma isn’t the problem. The hiring process is.
When her inbox hit 1,200 unread messages, Emma went to Fiverr. She typed “virtual assistant, reliable, proactive, English fluent” and hired someone in 48 hours. For two weeks, things looked fine. Then tasks slipped, instructions were repeated, and eventually, the VA disappeared mid-project.
So Emma said what many founders say in this situation:
“I guess I’m just bad at delegating.”
or
“There are no good people out there.”
But here’s what really happened:
• Nobody helped Emma define what she actually needed.
• Nobody asked, “What will success look like 90 days from now?”
• Nobody said, “You don’t need a VA, you need a project coordinator.”
Marketplaces can’t ask those questions. They just match keywords. They don’t challenge business owners on what they think they need. Marketplaces are built for transactions, not transformations.
Good agencies are different. They sit with the messy notes from founders, the voice messages, the vague frustration of “I just need help,” and turn that into a clear process. They design a role before the hire.
That invisible work — the questioning, the clarifying, the diagnosing — is what turns a two-week freelancer into a two-year team member.
So stop the cycle of hiring before understanding.
Before hiring, take the time to:
1- Get help defining what you truly need.
2- Map the skills to your real priorities.
3- Make sure your new hire has the context to succeed.
The goal isn’t to fill a seat fast. It’s to know when Fiverr fits, and when it doesn’t.
You Might also like
-
The Hire That Looked Perfect
The Hire That Looked Perfect
It looked like the perfect hire.
Strong resume.
Confident in the interview.
Great culture fit.Three months later, I was back in every decision.
Client approvals.
Team clarifications.
Budget adjustments.Nothing moved without me.
The problem wasn’t the person.
It was the role.
We hired talent.
But we never defined ownership.No clear decision rights.
No protected authority.
No metric that was fully theirs.So every issue climbed back up the ladder.
Here’s what founders miss:
If authority isn’t explicitly transferred, it defaults back to you.
Hiring didn’t fail.
Role design did.Growth adds people.
Scale redistributes control.Quick question:
What decisions are still coming back to you that shouldn’t be?
Post Views: 224 -
Ambiguity slows organizations far more than incompetence
Ambiguity slows organizations far more than incompetence
A slow team isn’t always an unmotivated team.
Sometimes it’s a careful one.
I once reviewed a company where everything seemed to move cautiously.
Leaders double-checked decisions.
Projects waited for confirmation.
Small issues escalated upward.
The founder assumed the team lacked urgency.
But when we asked one simple question —
“Who owns the final decision here?” —
No one could answer clearly.
So people protected themselves.
They asked.
They confirmed.
They waited.
Not because they lacked initiative.
Because the structure rewarded caution.
When ownership is clear, speed increases naturally.
People move faster when they know where the line of authority actually is.
Ambiguity slows organizations far more than incompetence.
Post Views: 266 -
Remote didn’t create the problem. It revealed it.
Remote didn’t create the problem. It revealed it.
That’s what a founder told me.
So we looked at the structure.
No written decision rights.
No documented processes.
No defined response expectations.
No escalation framework.
Accountability wasn’t missing.
Clarity was.
When teams work in the same office, ambiguity hides.
People overhear conversations.
They interrupt each other.
Decisions happen informally.
Things move… even when the system is weak.
Remote work removes that safety net.
Silence exposes structure.
If ownership isn’t defined, work stalls.
If decision rights aren’t clear, everything escalates.
If processes aren’t written, people wait.
Remote didn’t create the problem.
It revealed it.
Strong companies don’t rely on proximity.
They rely on structure.
Decision rights travel.
Ownership travels.
Clarity travels.
And when they do, location stops mattering.
Quick question for founders running remote teams:
If someone new joined your team tomorrow, could they clearly see what they own and what they can decide — without asking you?
Or would they have to figure it out through Slack messages and meetings?
Structure is what makes remote work scale.
Post Views: 192
