Have we turned hiring into Tinder?
Swipe. Match. Delete.
Hiring has started to look more and more like a high-churn dating game. Job platforms have made applying so easy that an employer can be swamped with hundreds of applications for a single role. A few get shortlisted, some get invited to interviews, and one gets chosen. The others—the ones who made it all the way to final rounds—receive a polite rejection. And that’s the end of the short romance. No follow-up. No “let’s stay in touch.”
A few months later, the new hire doesn’t work out—or another similar role needs to be filled. Suddenly the founder is scrambling: “Do you know anyone good? I need to rehire, fast.” And just like that, they’re back to hiring Tinder. Starting from scratch. Swipe. Match. Delete. Ignoring all the candidates from the last hiring round.
I believe most companies don’t have a hiring problem—they have a relationship problem. Hiring isn’t a one-off transaction. It’s a system of trust that grows over time, if it’s nurtured. It’s about keeping the door open, even when the role is already filled.
But if we treat candidates like one-time bets, it’s no wonder that hiring always feels like a cold start—with too many frogs to kiss before we get lucky (or not). The best founders I see have a relationship management system. Sometimes it’s as simple as adding every applicant on LinkedIn so that, when a new role opens up, previous candidates see it right away. That way, they keep their pipeline warm.
Great talent isn’t something we find at the push of a button. It’s something we build and foster long before we even know we need it.
You Might also like
-
Ambiguity slows organizations far more than incompetence
Ambiguity slows organizations far more than incompetence
A slow team isn’t always an unmotivated team.
Sometimes it’s a careful one.
I once reviewed a company where everything seemed to move cautiously.
Leaders double-checked decisions.
Projects waited for confirmation.
Small issues escalated upward.
The founder assumed the team lacked urgency.
But when we asked one simple question —
“Who owns the final decision here?” —
No one could answer clearly.
So people protected themselves.
They asked.
They confirmed.
They waited.
Not because they lacked initiative.
Because the structure rewarded caution.
When ownership is clear, speed increases naturally.
People move faster when they know where the line of authority actually is.
Ambiguity slows organizations far more than incompetence.
Post Views: 259 -
Special Episode: The Power of the Divine Feminine & How to Live an Epic Life with Justin Breen
n this episode, Rosemary sits down with Justin Breen, visionary entrepreneur, former journalist, and author of the upcoming book Epic Journey, to explore what it truly means to live an epic life—beyond money, titles, and external success.
Justin shares his journey from two decades as a journalist to building companies and writing books that focus on purpose, intuition, and the rise of the divine feminine. He reflects on the pivotal moments that shaped his path, including a profound shift in how he views leadership, success, and the human constructs—like business and sales—that often keep people trapped in anxiety and ego.
Throughout the conversation, Justin introduces his four-part pattern for identifying visionaries, discusses the role of trauma as fuel rather than excuse, and explains how tools like human design and numerology helped him understand his own rare 11 life path. He also offers a candid look at the dynamics between masculine and feminine energy, the importance of embracing both, and why so many high-performing women leaders are overcompensating in ways that leave them disconnected from what truly matters.
This episode is a thoughtful and deeply human conversation about purpose, relationships, and the courage it takes to unlearn old definitions of success in order to build something that lasts.
Post Views: 381 -
Everyone Knows an Emma (and That’s the Problem)
Everyone knows an Emma.
Emma, the founder drowning in to-dos.
Emma, who swore this month she’d finally get help.
Emma, who spent three hours on Fiverr trying to find “a VA who can do everything.” I call them unicorns.I’ve met many Emmas, and here’s what I’ve observed: Emma isn’t the problem. The hiring process is.
When her inbox hit 1,200 unread messages, Emma went to Fiverr. She typed “virtual assistant, reliable, proactive, English fluent” and hired someone in 48 hours. For two weeks, things looked fine. Then tasks slipped, instructions were repeated, and eventually, the VA disappeared mid-project.
So Emma said what many founders say in this situation:
“I guess I’m just bad at delegating.”
or
“There are no good people out there.”But here’s what really happened:
• Nobody helped Emma define what she actually needed.
• Nobody asked, “What will success look like 90 days from now?”
• Nobody said, “You don’t need a VA, you need a project coordinator.”Marketplaces can’t ask those questions. They just match keywords. They don’t challenge business owners on what they think they need. Marketplaces are built for transactions, not transformations.
Good agencies are different. They sit with the messy notes from founders, the voice messages, the vague frustration of “I just need help,” and turn that into a clear process. They design a role before the hire.
That invisible work — the questioning, the clarifying, the diagnosing — is what turns a two-week freelancer into a two-year team member.
So stop the cycle of hiring before understanding.
Before hiring, take the time to:
1- Get help defining what you truly need.
2- Map the skills to your real priorities.
3- Make sure your new hire has the context to succeed.The goal isn’t to fill a seat fast. It’s to know when Fiverr fits, and when it doesn’t.
Post Views: 688
